MRI in Diagnostic of the Female Pelvis Maugnancies: Five Year Period Experiences

Authors

  • Lidija Lincender Institute of Radiology, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, BH
  • Sandra Vegar Institute of Radiology, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, BH
  • Dunja Vrcić Institute of Radiology, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, BH
  • Vesna Đurović Institute of Radiology, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, BH
  • Bujar Gjikolli Institute of Radiology, University Clinical Center of Kosova in Prishtinë, Kosova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5644/Radovi.384

Keywords:

female pelvis, disease, malignancy, uterus, ovary, MRI

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess diagnostic accuracy of MRI in differentiation of female pelvis disorders. We compared our results with clinical staging and post-operative findings.

Method and Material: During the five-year period we performed MRI of the female pelvis at 225 patients. Average age of patients was 42. In 92 (36%) patients, MRI revealed ovarian malignancy, in 61 (24%) patients’ uterine carcinomas, in 54 (24%) recto-sigmoid tumours — Krukcnberg and the other 18 (8%) patients had non-malignant diseases of pelvis. Ali patients were examined on MR 1,0 T units, with body coil: axial, sagittal and sometimes coronal planes T2 WITSE and TI WI SE sequences were used. If it was necessary contrast medium - gadolinium was injected intravenously during T1WI SE sequences, and FAT SAT, when needed.

Results: In our reports we compared MRI results with clinical staging (gynaecological examination, TAUS sometimes TVUS, CT) and post-operative findings, with sensitivity 89% and specifity 76 %.

Conclusion: As we know from the literature the most authors consider that MRI today is the method of choice in the staging of pelvis malignancy, with exception of staging of ovarian malignancy, were CT is the preferred method.

References

O'Brien WF, Buck DR, Nash JD. Evaluation of sonography in the initial assessment of the gynecologic patient. Gynecology 1984; 149:593-602.

Walsh JW, Taylor KJW, Wasson M, et al. Gray scale ultrasound in 204 proved gynecologic masses: accuracy and specific diagnosis criteria. Radiology 1979; 130:391- 397.

Kerr-Wilson RM, Shingelton HM, Orr JN. The use of US and CT scaning in the management of the ginecologic cancer patient. Gynecol Oncol 1984; 18:54-61.

Lee JKT, Balfe D. Pelvis. In Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ. Eds Computed body tomography, New York: Ravena Press, 1983 ; 393-419.

Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis : initial experience. AJR1983; 141:1119-28.

Bryan PS, Butter He, Lipuma JP, et al. NMR scaning of the pelvis:initiale experience with 0, 3 T system. AJR 1983 ; 141:1111-1118.

Kinkel K, Hricak H, Lu Y, Tsuda K, Filly RA. US characterisation of the ovarian masses :a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 217 : 803-811.

Hricak H, Kim BK Contrast enhanced MR imaging of female pelvisJ Mag Reson Imaging 1993 ; 3 : 297-306.

Hricak H, Change YchF. The female pelvis. In Higgins ChB, Hricak H, eds. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of body, New York:Ravena Press, 1987; 403-431.

Ascher SM, MR imaging of the female pelvis:the time has come. Radiographics 1998; 18 : 913-954.

Bum PR, Mc Call JM, Chin RJ, Vashisht A, Smith JR, Healy JC. Uterine fibroleomyoma. MR imaging appearance before and after embolisation of uterine arteries. Radiology 2000; 214: 729-734.

Crofton M. Ginecological imaging. In Sutton D. Seventh eds. Texbook of radiology and imaging. Volume 2, London, Churchil Livingston, 2003 ; 1096-1105.

Creasman WT. New ginecological cancer staging (editorial). Ginecologic Oncology, 1995 ; 58 :157-158.

Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Scarfone G et al. Carcinoma the cervix : value of plain and gadolinium — enchanced MR imaging in assesing of invasiveness. Radiology 1993 ; 188:797-801.

Hricak H, Yu KK Radiology in invasive cervical carcinomaAJR 1996; 167:1101-1108.

Hawnaur JM. Review: staging of cervical carcinoma. Clinical Radiology. 1993;47:7-13.

Kim SH, Kim HD, Song YS, Kang SB, Lee HP. Detection of deep myometral invasion in endometrial carcinoma; comparaison of transvaginal ultrasound, CT and MRI. Journal of Computed Assisted Tomography 1995; 19:766-772.

Guinet C, Ghossain MA, Buy JN, et al. Mature cystic teratomas of the ovary: CT and MRI findings. EUR J Radiol. 1995; 20:137-143.

Outwater EK, Dunton CJ. Imaging of the ovary and adnexa: clinical issues and applications of MRI. 1995; 194:1-18.

Low RN, Čarter WD. Salch F, Sigeti JS. Ovarian cancer rcomparison of findings with perfluorcarbon enhanced MR imaging. In 111-CYT- 103 imunoscintigraphy and CT. Radiology 1995 ; 195 :391-400.

Forstner R, Hricak H, Occhipinti KA, Powel CB, Frankel SD, Stem JL. Ovarian cancer: with CT and MR imaging . Radiology 1995; 197: 619-629.

Downloads

Published

13.08.2004

Issue

Section

Works

How to Cite

MRI in Diagnostic of the Female Pelvis Maugnancies: Five Year Period Experiences. (2004). Acta Medica Academica, 33, 113-124. https://doi.org/10.5644/Radovi.384

Most read articles by the same author(s)